home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: www.cybercity.dk!usenet
- From: ccc6004@vip.cybercity.dk (Hans Henrik Happe)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Demo/game to OS frien
- Date: 8 Feb 1996 16:40:43 GMT
- Organization: CyberCity of Denmark
- Message-ID: <1330.6612T1051T1166@vip.cybercity.dk>
- References: <4f6r3v$2de@sinsen.sn.no>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.16.56.145
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
-
- Thore Bjerklund Karlsen ( tbk@sn.no ) wrote:
-
- >>>What is the difference between Forbid() and SetTaskPri(127)?
-
- >>The fact that Forbid() is inefficient ?
-
- > Which means?
-
- >>>Do you call SetTaskPri(veryhigh), LoadView(0) and OwnBlitter() no
- >>>shutting down the OS?
-
- >>Pure c0d3r-style argumentation.
-
- >>And no, not even that is "shutting down the OS".
-
- > But Forbid() is?
-
- That's not true. The interups is still going strong. Disable() is what you want
- if you will shut it all down. But you won't!!!
-
- I have once tryed to speed test the interups of my system when nothing happend
- (no modem, no musik just a booting WB), and I found out that it's only int level 2
- that are used much, and that's only about a raster line. So I think I will try to
- install my Int's with the system, instead off killing the systems int's. Have anyone
- tryed this?
-
- >>>Everything CAN be made OS-compatible.. But at a price.
-
- >>The price is to give up the c0d3r ideology.
-
- > Well then. All you have to do is give me a breathtaking example which
- > will make me convert to pure OS-compliant code.
-
- > __
- > \\\__ Thore B. Karlsen % tbk@sn.no % C64-C128D-A1200-A2000C
- > \XX/ Wowbagger/AFL&SSN % -c0d3r- % A1230/50MHz-2C8F/340MB
- >
-
-
- Hans Henrik Happe
- Alias Goat / Sumpen
-
-